I was asked to illustrate the meaning of life.

For an answer to that rhetorical question, I referred to my favorite dead philosopher, Jeremy Bentham. Happiness is the answer (obviously), and so I used his 9 Pleasures of Stimulation as a basis for the illustration.

This is the result, which appeared recently in the German publication, Süddeutsche Zeitung Magazin.

And below is the English version (click to enlarge).

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
This entry was posted in 5x7, philosophy, work. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to I was asked to illustrate the meaning of life.

  1. Chris L says:

    You’re awesome.

  2. Chris McCray says:

    Poster.

    Please, make this available to buy poster size.

    This is 100% awesomesauce!

  3. Mapel says:

    Really nice.
    Already my favorite post of this blog.

  4. YOU are the most amazingly brilliant genius! <3

  5. fireflight says:

    Did anybody else start by looking up all the Gs?

  6. Pingback: What Makes Life Worth Living? An Illustrated Answer

  7. Neil says:

    Although Bentham’s utilitarian philosophy is superficially appealing, it has some unfortunate consequences. The central problem is that you can use it to justify just about anything. If a majority perceives improved happiness in the benefits accruing to them from the enslavement of a minority, then the happiness of the greater number might be used to justify the misery of the smaller.

  8. Steve Robinson says:

    Sheer, unadulterated brilliance!

  9. Hollow tree ventures says:

    This is my new favorite thing ever.

  10. Pingback: Suggestion Saturday: December 29, 2012 | On The Other Hand

  11. Pingback: The Internet is Amazing: 01.06.2013 ← Ellie Di

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>