About
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.Subscribe
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Categories
- 5×7
- arrogance
- booze
- brands
- communication
- consumption
- creeps
- crime
- easter bunny
- ego
- ethics
- excuses
- expectations
- experience
- faith
- family
- fashion
- finances
- friends
- gum
- halloween
- hipsters
- inequality
- kids
- language
- love
- men
- moderation
- monsters
- music
- optimism
- orthodontics
- pain
- parties
- patience
- perception
- philosophy
- politics
- pop culture
- queens
- santa
- school
- sickness
- snobs
- snuggling
- sports
- standards
- stress
- success
- technology
- television
- tooth fairy
- travel
- Uncategorized
- value
- virginity
- weight
- women
- work
- xenophobia








Fractured skulls make for catchy chants.
Pingback: Tweets that mention Kids sing the darndest things. | Indexed -- Topsy.com
Forgive my nit-pickyness, but as the number of head injuries increase, doesn’t the number of monkeys jumping on the bed decrease?
It’s absolute correlation. For every monkey jumping on the bed there is a traumatic head injury. At least, according to the song.
Ha. Too funny, Jessica. Children love a good dark tale put to song.
Humpty Dumpty, London Bridges, the list goes on.
We love to take kids to the dark side, don’t we?
Boing!
I read that as “Kissing the darnest things” but went back and re-read it more carefully after the graph made no sense what-so-ever, but I’m still confused.
Micky, Davy, Peter, and Michael did many crazy things, but jumping on beds doesn’t ring any bells. What episode was this?
It’s a reference to a children’s song, possibly better known in the UK than in the USA (I first discovered it in a songbook my son received as a gift):
Two more verses follow (with two and then with one monkey, respectively). The doctor’s very last line is “That’s what you get for jumping on the bed!”
For what it’s worth, I think the line should have been absolutely straight, instead of suggesting the slight upward curve.
johanges was trying to make a classic rock/television joke, despite the fact that the band/series in question was spelled “Monkees,” not “monkeys.”
Seems to me that the line should have a negative slope. Each time there’s a head injury, the number of monkeys on the bed decreases.
The horizontal coordinate isn’t time, it’s the (original) number of monkeys on the bed. No matter how many monkeys you start with, at the end of the song they’ve all fallen off.
If you started with 3 monkeys on the bed, then according to the song, there would be 3 injuries. If you started with 4 monkey, there would be 4 injuries, etc.
Every version I’m familiar with starts with five little monkeys; it’s meant to be counted down on one hand (sometimes with finger puppets).
Pingback: Stumbling Over Chaos :: Sometimes I absolutely cannot come up with a clever title for linkity… this would be one of those times