About
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.Subscribe
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.
Superb. I guess the bottom of the curve would be “Normal people”?
Nadir = Nader
We need to show the inverse relationship between “purity of image” and “actual purity.”
May have to call BS on the “high purity of image = high revenue” correlation. (Are we talking Disney auto-pop acts? Or…?) Pat Boone has a pretty high purity of image, but I don’t think his revenues are that high anymore. (Of course, when he was at the top of his game, his revenue was pretty high…maybe there is something to it.)
This is so on point! Your creative ability to see and expose the less exposed truths. Love it Jessica!
If the curve dips below both axises (both revenue and purity) then you are probably a golfer from Florida.
So Tiger Woods went from the right end to the bottom, and to get back on top he needs to climb up the left branch? Ditch the marriage counselor and get mo’ hookers and blow, Tiger!
I’m with David L. on this one… I think the “pop stars” arrow needs to point at the other high end of the curve.
Pingback: fun & comedy » Blog Archive » Like a virgin for the money.
red – The arrow points to the curve, not just a single point on it.
@ David L. I’d like to see the comparitive graphs on that for our president.