Blitzed.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Indexed
{ PUBLISHED WEEKDAY MORNINGS as the COFFEE BREWS }
About this site
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.
- Here's the deal →
Subscribe
RSS:
Blog Archive
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Labels
- 5×7 (17)
- arrogance (24)
- booze (26)
- brands (31)
- communication (72)
- consumption (119)
- creeps (24)
- crime (14)
- easter bunny (3)
- ego (24)
- ethics (72)
- excuses (38)
- expectations (142)
- experience (61)
- faith (30)
- family (50)
- fashion (38)
- finances (111)
- friends (26)
- gum (2)
- halloween (7)
- hipsters (9)
- inequality (42)
- kids (39)
- language (35)
- love (84)
- men (18)
- moderation (21)
- music (5)
- optimism (51)
- orthodontics (4)
- pain (57)
- parties (29)
- patience (19)
- perception (169)
- philosophy (28)
- politics (54)
- pop culture (101)
- queens (1)
- santa (9)
- school (41)
- sickness (42)
- snobs (7)
- snuggling (1)
- sports (9)
- standards (35)
- stress (20)
- success (20)
- technology (29)
- television (25)
- tooth fairy (2)
- travel (24)
- Uncategorized (517)
- value (48)
- virginity (4)
- weight (13)
- women (45)
- work (97)
- xenophobia (2)
January 12th, 2010 at 12:51 pm
baha. good one.
January 12th, 2010 at 12:59 pm
BWAHAHAHA! That’s brilliant and hysterical!
January 12th, 2010 at 2:26 pm
Wouldn’t the cheerleaders reputations go UP the more they go DOWN?
January 12th, 2010 at 2:29 pm
@D - It depends on what kind of reputation your trying to establish.
January 12th, 2010 at 4:38 pm
Wow. Quite a zinger.
January 12th, 2010 at 5:01 pm
hahahahaha, fantastic
January 12th, 2010 at 5:38 pm
AHAHAHHA, that’s so great!
January 12th, 2010 at 6:43 pm
ouch. I’d hate to be a slutty cheerleader right now… not like there’s much chance of that happening though… seeing as how I’m a 250 pound heterosexual man and all… still… not impossible… but unlikely…
January 12th, 2010 at 7:39 pm
I agree with D. I believe, at least stereotypically, the inverse would be true for cheerleaders.
January 13th, 2010 at 5:11 am
There is a saying in German:
“The reputation of a woman depends on the silence of many men.” (Hope I translated it right).
Therefore, Brad and D, I would say the graph is quite corrrect. But perhaps I do misinterpret it…
January 13th, 2010 at 9:15 am
(cough) Tom Brady (cough)
January 13th, 2010 at 2:43 pm
Go Down or Get Sacked!
January 13th, 2010 at 8:12 pm
That being said, it could also refer to falling off the top of the pyramid. In which case their reputation would, indeed, go down.
…The innuendo is still funny. The double entendre just makes it better.
January 18th, 2010 at 1:26 am
This one’s very well done!
January 18th, 2010 at 5:05 am
[...] humor. She does not post about sports a lot, but last week she did. In her blog entry called “Blitzed“, she postulated that for both quarterbacks and cheerleaders, the more often they go down the [...]
January 25th, 2010 at 1:54 pm
I think the graph is exactly correct. Girls are not rewarded with a good reputation if they have sex (or rumors say they have sex). Its all downhill.
February 7th, 2010 at 1:11 pm
Being a cheerleader on a fairly good team, it really depends how many cheerleaders are slutty. If it’s just you you could have a great reputation from just assosiation of the virgin ones.