About
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.Subscribe
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Categories
- 5×7
- arrogance
- booze
- brands
- communication
- consumption
- creeps
- crime
- easter bunny
- ego
- ethics
- excuses
- expectations
- experience
- faith
- family
- fashion
- finances
- friends
- gum
- halloween
- hipsters
- inequality
- kids
- language
- love
- men
- moderation
- monsters
- music
- optimism
- orthodontics
- pain
- parties
- patience
- perception
- philosophy
- politics
- pop culture
- queens
- santa
- school
- sickness
- snobs
- snuggling
- sports
- standards
- stress
- success
- technology
- television
- tooth fairy
- travel
- Uncategorized
- value
- virginity
- weight
- women
- work
- xenophobia
Darwin vs. KFC.
This entry was posted in consumption. Bookmark the permalink.








Very true & funny.
I’ve often joked that the best way to save endangered species is to start raising them for food.
Absolutely brilliant. What a way to die … to be nurtured only to be killed!!
Save the earth! Eat the spotted owl!
@iHunger
The converse is true too.
Many “weeds” are edible. As a youngster, I tried to get my parents to see the wisdom of this, figuring that if we ate the weeds from the garden, they would die off of their own accord.
Anything to try to get out of weeding the garden.
Unfortunately, as the population goes up, the quality of life goes down for those numerous chickens. Nobody looks at those factory-farm chickens and says, “Man, that’s what I call living!”
Unfortunately, as the population goes up, the quality of life goes down for those numerous chickens. Nobody looks at those factory-farm chickens and says, “Man, that’s what I call living!”
I guess you don’t live around Manhattan, then?
So true!
My parents often relate that when they were growing up a roast chicken was an infrequent delicacy, whereas nowadays they’re commodity fast food.
couldn’t be more true
Garrett McLean at sm compufix
Technically, the chicken part should be a dot, not a line. The population of the chicken species does not grow with predators, except over large periods of time. Since chickens are one species, they are a stationary dot in the upper left corner.
I think it would maybe be funny, too.
Technically, the chicken part should be a dot, not a line.
The ideas is that as the human population grows (which is to some degree a coincidence) so does the popularity of mass produced chickens. it’s a line.
interestingly enough, line A is in reality a kind of bell curve- a species with no predators will grow very large, but a near-extinct species will often have a singe predator (alright, alright “… and Mankind”).
Pingback: Darwin vs. KFC (via Indexed) | i love myles [beta]