Good turkey to you & yours.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Indexed
{ PUBLISHED WEEKDAY MORNINGS as the COFFEE BREWS }
About this site
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.
- Here's the deal →
Subscribe
RSS:
Blog Archive
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Labels
- 5×7 (17)
- arrogance (24)
- booze (26)
- brands (31)
- communication (72)
- consumption (118)
- creeps (23)
- crime (11)
- easter bunny (3)
- ego (24)
- ethics (71)
- excuses (38)
- expectations (140)
- experience (61)
- faith (30)
- family (50)
- fashion (38)
- finances (111)
- friends (26)
- gum (2)
- halloween (7)
- hipsters (9)
- inequality (42)
- kids (38)
- language (34)
- love (83)
- men (18)
- moderation (21)
- music (5)
- optimism (51)
- orthodontics (4)
- pain (55)
- parties (28)
- patience (19)
- perception (166)
- philosophy (28)
- politics (54)
- pop culture (99)
- queens (1)
- santa (9)
- school (40)
- sickness (42)
- snobs (6)
- snuggling (1)
- sports (8)
- standards (35)
- stress (20)
- success (20)
- technology (29)
- television (25)
- tooth fairy (2)
- travel (24)
- Uncategorized (516)
- value (48)
- virginity (3)
- weight (13)
- women (45)
- work (95)
- xenophobia (2)
November 26th, 2009 at 9:28 am
Couldn’t be a more appropriate representation of the truth for Thanksgiving! I, especially, like the position of “lies”.
November 26th, 2009 at 12:16 pm
Hahaah. Stalkers is good.
November 26th, 2009 at 1:44 pm
I love your jokes, but this one is sick. Stalking is not love. It doesn’t even resemble it.
November 26th, 2009 at 4:47 pm
In the eyes of the stalker, it is love. In the eyes of the victim, not so much.
November 27th, 2009 at 4:50 am
Would be above reproach if it said “people who say they love you”, but the point is understood either way.
–Ember–
November 27th, 2009 at 6:34 am
Oh, how lucky that someone can tell me I’m not really happy! Even though I do have few loved ones, I actually thought I was. I now see the error of this thinking, and will crawl to a corner to cry. Thank you, for knowing me better than I know myself!
December 3rd, 2009 at 11:48 pm
this doesn’t really make sense to me… do you mean “the # of people who love you”? or “the degree to which a person loves you”? just the phrase “People who love you” on its own isn’t a quantifiable thing. a lot of these graphs are confusing because the label on the x axis doesn’t really make sense (but the venn diagrams are really funny)
December 30th, 2009 at 8:18 pm
an axis is assumed to be a continuously rising number line unless other categories are specified, so “people who love you” is automatically “# of people who love you”. If it was amount of love, it would not have the word people there.