About
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.Subscribe
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Categories
- 5×7
- arrogance
- BOOK!
- booze
- brands
- communication
- consumption
- creeps
- crime
- easter bunny
- ego
- ethics
- excuses
- expectations
- experience
- faith
- family
- fashion
- finances
- friends
- gum
- halloween
- hipsters
- inequality
- kids
- language
- love
- men
- moderation
- monsters
- music
- optimism
- orthodontics
- pain
- parties
- patience
- perception
- philosophy
- politics
- pop culture
- queens
- santa
- school
- sickness
- snobs
- snuggling
- sports
- standards
- stress
- success
- technology
- television
- tooth fairy
- travel
- Uncategorized
- value
- virginity
- weight
- women
- work
- xenophobia









I don’t necessarily agree. I think some questions can thwart innovation; there are some, though, that are a necessary part of innovating, and some that spawn entire new branches of innovation — what if we did it like THIS instead?!
I think its a ‘in your face’ apt commentary on bureaucracy.
“That’s a fine idea, but did you fill out form number 57B? You’ll have to take it to the central office to have it processed. Then bring it back here.”
I read it as double-edged for both bureaucracy and science. Both are tools for taming ideas.
Taming ideas by bureaucracy can undermine them, for better (“Is eugenics constitutional?”) or for worse (“But will an electric car sell?”).
Taming ideas by science can undermine them, for better (“Do we have empirical evidence for typical human religious beliefs?”) or for worse (“Do we have empirical evidence for typical human religious beliefs?”).
As a graphic designer, I live this hell regularly,… “What if we take the text from that logo and the symbol from that one and put them together instead?” (The answer is “Frankenlogo” by the way).
True story.
Them – “You guys need to come up with some ideas!”
Me – “OK”
Me – Them
Idea 1 – ummm, no thanks
Idea 2 – ummm, no thanks
Idea 3 – ummm, no thanks
…..
Idea 50 – ummm, no thanks
Me – “I’m done”.
(I saw 3 of my ideas get used later with no credit to me)
@Will: I officially nominate your comment on science for the internet ‘Examples of the Year’ award. Well played.
I felt the double edged sword and would propose an alternative. The intersection of Ideas and Questions Answered is Innovation. The intersection of Ideas and Questions Asked is Innovation Thwarted.
Pingback: Future Fundraising Now