About
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.Subscribe
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Categories
- 5×7
- arrogance
- BOOK!
- booze
- brands
- communication
- consumption
- creeps
- crime
- easter bunny
- ego
- ethics
- excuses
- expectations
- experience
- faith
- family
- fashion
- finances
- friends
- gum
- halloween
- hipsters
- inequality
- kids
- language
- love
- men
- moderation
- monsters
- music
- optimism
- orthodontics
- pain
- parties
- patience
- perception
- philosophy
- politics
- pop culture
- queens
- santa
- school
- sickness
- snobs
- snuggling
- sports
- standards
- stress
- success
- technology
- television
- tooth fairy
- travel
- Uncategorized
- value
- virginity
- weight
- women
- work
- xenophobia









ya….im lost
I might argue the “B” line might tip up toward the lower sizes… scrawny security guards aren’t that intimidating, even to fat kids.
Personally I have been intimidated by a scrawny guard before. He looked like he might have bitten me.
I am wondering about causation here. Do short security guards get filtered out to work at malls rather than say, chemical laboratories? Or do a short security guards leverage so little respect that they foster larger packs of punk kids?
So did you out run him?
Remember, I don’t have to outrun him.
I just have to outrun you.
Punk kids are just misunderstood. They’re really not that bad, they just aren’t used to be treated with respect.
Those students who gravitate to me the most are those that other teachers write off and refuse to help.
Are there any kids at malls these days? And haven’t all the punk kids from the 80′s grown up to be mall security guards anyways?
.. that or CEOs of web startups.
no, we became city planners…so we could annoy our old tormentors with poorly laid out streets and badly timed traffic lights….
Does this mean a short, skinny security guard deters more punk kids at the mall than a tall, skinny security guard?
this one’s a mess…
This calls for a 3D plot:
- x-axis: height of guard
- y-axis: thickness of guard
- z-axis: number of punk kids