Why some actors do indie films for cheap.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
June 17th, 2009 at 2:28 pm
Oscar
-or-
Twitter
June 17th, 2009 at 4:21 pm
Twitter would be a lot more painful, as the soliloquy would be split to hundreds of 140-character lines.
@Horatio: alas, poor yorick, I knew him. (insert tinyurl link to Wikipedia article on Denmark)
June 17th, 2009 at 7:15 pm
Alternatively, you could have replaced trauma, soliloquy and disability with trash, trash and more trash.
June 17th, 2009 at 8:13 pm
You could also add “Homosexual”, “Female-identifying”, “Ethnic Minority”….
June 17th, 2009 at 9:47 pm
Disability is a definite Oscar-caliber performance regardless. It worked for Dustin Hoffman and Sean Penn.
If only soliloquy worked, Pacino would have ten Oscars.
June 18th, 2009 at 10:25 am
This could also be titled “Why some actors do reality TV”. Celeb rehab with Dr. Drew comes to mind…
June 24th, 2009 at 12:22 pm
Trauma/Disability should be lawsuit
Trauma/Soliloquy should be dying wishes
Soliloquy/Disability should be angry veteran
Otherwise, dynomite
June 30th, 2009 at 3:01 pm
I’d replace the 3 circles for writers looking to win an Oscar with…
Underdog wins
Hero doesn’t die, but others do
Makes audience feel okay to duck real issues at hand
January 7th, 2010 at 1:31 am
What is the relation between the title and the diagram? I really don’t get it. Am I that stupid, not understand about it.