Thank you for being a friend.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Indexed
{ PUBLISHED WEEKDAY MORNINGS as the COFFEE BREWS }
About this site
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.
- Here's the deal →
Subscribe
RSS:
Blog Archive
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Labels
- 5×7 (17)
- arrogance (24)
- booze (26)
- brands (31)
- communication (72)
- consumption (118)
- creeps (23)
- crime (11)
- easter bunny (3)
- ego (24)
- ethics (71)
- excuses (38)
- expectations (140)
- experience (61)
- faith (30)
- family (50)
- fashion (38)
- finances (111)
- friends (26)
- gum (2)
- halloween (7)
- hipsters (9)
- inequality (42)
- kids (38)
- language (34)
- love (83)
- men (18)
- moderation (21)
- music (5)
- optimism (51)
- orthodontics (4)
- pain (55)
- parties (28)
- patience (19)
- perception (166)
- philosophy (28)
- politics (54)
- pop culture (99)
- queens (1)
- santa (9)
- school (40)
- sickness (42)
- snobs (6)
- snuggling (1)
- sports (8)
- standards (35)
- stress (20)
- success (20)
- technology (29)
- television (25)
- tooth fairy (2)
- travel (24)
- Uncategorized (516)
- value (48)
- virginity (3)
- weight (13)
- women (45)
- work (95)
- xenophobia (2)
May 13th, 2009 at 11:52 am
I … I just …
… I don’t have any words for this.
May 13th, 2009 at 12:01 pm
Ha ha ha ha!!!
Though I am a little disturbed that I got this, in spite of being a guy.
May 13th, 2009 at 12:09 pm
Not sure if I understand this one, but if you happen to know one (pre- or post-) who is horny, tiny, AND naive, she is going to be pretty popular.
May 13th, 2009 at 12:10 pm
I don’t know the ACEG names. Different show?
May 13th, 2009 at 12:10 pm
I wish someone would find new long-lost episodes of Sex & The City.
May 13th, 2009 at 12:12 pm
Brad: They’re the characters from Sex in the City.
May 13th, 2009 at 12:29 pm
[...] Indexed » Blog Archive » Thank you for being a friend. - Brilliant dissection of two shows. [...]
May 13th, 2009 at 12:33 pm
Brilliant
May 13th, 2009 at 12:42 pm
Wow! I never noticed the similarities… I guess that means that we are due for a sequel / remake to Sex In The City … in 2034? Called Sex in Retirement?
Golden in the City?
Too much fun !
May 13th, 2009 at 12:48 pm
Bea Arthur may have been manly, but she was also wicked hot.
Best Indexed Ever =)
May 13th, 2009 at 1:42 pm
-applause-
May 13th, 2009 at 2:28 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMGhd4jMrtI
May 13th, 2009 at 3:27 pm
this is perfectly true… and makes me feel very old…
and in a weird way: could it be that SATC is a goldengirls prequel?
May 13th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
[...] This is brilliant: [...]
May 13th, 2009 at 5:17 pm
This may be the first time I’ve ever ‘guffawed’. This is genius.
May 13th, 2009 at 5:54 pm
Big circle around the whole thing = I = guy hell.
May 13th, 2009 at 7:12 pm
This is my favorite indexed ever!
May 13th, 2009 at 7:45 pm
This is hilarious!
May 13th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Unfortunately this set-up seems pretty standard for shows with four females as the main characters. You could add a pubescent/Facts of Life section too:
horny/sexualized = Blair
manly = Jo
tiny = Tootie
naive = Natalie
May 13th, 2009 at 11:12 pm
Dave, I think that would be “Sex in Sun City.”
May 13th, 2009 at 11:46 pm
Genius. Pure genius.
May 14th, 2009 at 3:22 am
Wow. I never thought to think of it like that…I will never see the shows in the same light again.
May 14th, 2009 at 7:45 am
Excellent! Just perfect.
May 14th, 2009 at 8:44 am
yup, Menopause is basically the only difference.
Nailed it as usual!
May 14th, 2009 at 9:03 am
Besides the name relationship, observe the shape. Between the lips you have horny on top tickling your interest, manly going right for the goal, tiny close but not measuring up, and naive wanting to sneak in the back door.
May 14th, 2009 at 9:53 am
This one was just perfect. I am sending it to everyone I know. I loved GG.
May 14th, 2009 at 10:09 am
Oh, man. Just to let you know there are people like me, I’ve never seen an entire episode of either of these shows. Just paint an “L” on my forehead and let me out of the cage.
May 14th, 2009 at 10:11 am
I can’t believe I never noticed that before! I love it!
May 14th, 2009 at 10:44 am
I would amend this classification: why not classify Miranda and Sophia as “wise”, and then Dorothy and Carrie as “pragmatic”? Tiny and manly are two odd and a tad insulting adjectives, and they don’t speak at all about their attitudes and views. Moreover, Dorothy and Carrie are the central characters in their respective shows, so they have to be classified together.
May 14th, 2009 at 11:05 am
My friend you are just brilliant!
May 14th, 2009 at 12:23 pm
Sieglinde,
I think she didn’t use “wise” and “pragmatic” because she’s trying to be funny. You see, there’s this thing called “comedy,” and…well, whatever.
Jessica,
Great work, I love the comment about Facts of Life. Can’t think of any other shows with 4 female leads…
May 14th, 2009 at 4:19 pm
For ages, I’ve said that Sex and the City is just a bad rip off of Golden Girls.
May 15th, 2009 at 12:12 pm
Jessica, seriously, best Indexed ever. I’m spreading this one around!!
P.S. Sieglinde…she doesn’t HAVE to do anything. Yes, Dorothy & Carrie are the leads to their shows–that’s one characteristic. They have many, many more. Get a life!
May 15th, 2009 at 1:43 pm
I see someone else watched the marathon last week too …
May 15th, 2009 at 5:18 pm
OK - this is a strecth but how about:
In a circle marked Literary:
Horny - Meg
Manly - Jo
Tiny - Amy
Naive - Beth
May 16th, 2009 at 9:18 am
PERFECT!
Reminded me of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdFvndmM_8I
May 19th, 2009 at 10:40 am
YES - Mary!!!
I immediately thought of Little Women.
Great job.
May 20th, 2009 at 12:36 am
[...] indexed: Thank you for being a friend. Tags: funny, popculture, tv post a [...]
May 21st, 2009 at 2:20 pm
@ Mike
Actually, it’s a combination of The Golden Girls and the gang from Sex and The City. Interesting.
May 23rd, 2009 at 7:38 pm
Horny - Suzanne
Manly - Julia
Tiny - Mary Jo
Naive - Charlene
June 10th, 2009 at 9:37 pm
uh, missing here:
Scarlett
Ilsa
Baby Jane
others? buehler?
June 13th, 2009 at 7:18 am
If this was on a shirt I’d buy it.