About
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.Subscribe
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Categories
- 5×7
- arrogance
- BOOK!
- booze
- brands
- communication
- consumption
- creeps
- crime
- easter bunny
- ego
- ethics
- excuses
- expectations
- experience
- faith
- family
- fashion
- finances
- friends
- gum
- halloween
- hipsters
- inequality
- kids
- language
- love
- men
- moderation
- monsters
- music
- optimism
- orthodontics
- pain
- parties
- patience
- perception
- philosophy
- politics
- pop culture
- queens
- santa
- school
- sickness
- snobs
- snuggling
- sports
- standards
- stress
- success
- technology
- television
- tooth fairy
- travel
- Uncategorized
- value
- virginity
- weight
- women
- work
- xenophobia









I have found that my creativity increase is inversely proportional to the amount of stress in my life.
Just an observation: The axes are not mislabelled?
The way I read it, in periods of great stress, one either has no creativity or lots of creativity.
If creativity was on the Y-axis and stress on the X, it would read that great creativity comes in times of either little stress or lots of stress.
Agree with Joker. At least, this graph with the axes switched would be a more accurate representation of MY life.
I agree, it would make much more sense if the axis labels were switched.
Looks fine the way it is…can not of you work under pressure?
DB
the independent variable here is creativity, so it should be read as “when creativity is low, stress is high. When creativity is medium/normal, stress is low, and when creativity is really high stress is high. Makes perfect sense in the context of deadlines as the title indicates.
So, really creative people are more stressed than I am? And really uncreative people are too, but I’m just fine. Huh.
But I tend to get less creative when I become less stressed… which according to this would cause me to become more stressed…?
A perfect model of any Food Network Challenge.
Boring Cake = loser
Awesome Cake Art = loser via (a serious chance) of having no finished cake at all
In my world, the axis labels would be switched and the curve would be flipped.
When stress is low, creativity is not especially high. With moderate stress comes higher creativity. And with high stress, creativity craters.
Sooooooo true.
It makes sense if you consider that for any given level of stress, there are TWO creativity levels, one high and one low.
Sometimes deadlines force you to get moving, to stop debating your options and just DO SOMETHING. Other times they just way down on you, and make your lack of ideas seem like an ever-widening hole into which you are falling.
This one reflects my reality perfectly. Dammit.
What if Creativity is always a 0-value, but stress fluctuates? Does that mean I’m doing it all wrong? :-/
Pingback: Deadlines - Marci Ikeler
I completely get this. The axes are not mislabeled, and I live a work life that swoops from one end of the curve to the other.
I don’t think the axes are mislabeled either. If a person is too creative, they create stress in a boring society. If no one is creative, society doesn’t grow or improve.
When creativity is low, then there’s stress to finish something before the next deadline.
When creativity is high, there’s stress to get it all done, or to at least make the notes and catalogue it all (but then there’s the stress of leaving it unfinished).
So I think the axes are fine where they are.
I guess the axes can go either way; I just usually think of my stress levels influencing my creativity more than my creativity influences my stress levels.
Pingback: edfoc.us » Blog Archive » The Beauty of the Visual
I think that the line could represent one of two things:
either amount of time spent or amount of money available
and I’m totally feeling the time aspect right now
Pingback: Marc: My Words : Deadlines!
Axis Label Controversy ’09!!
I could see it working both ways, depending on the kind of person you are. If you work in a medium where an excess of creativity can be a liability, like a syndicated newspaper comic or a Michael Bay movie, then it can be stressful to have your thoughts entirely occupied by the sort of thing that isn’t marketable to the masses.
But personally, I would not only swap them, I’d also add an extra downcurve at the extreme right: I do rediscover my brilliance as deadlines loom, but if it gets too close, or something else is piled on top of the original request, or some other calamitous event comes down the pipe, I tend to freak out and go catatonic.
You’ve been working too hard!
So if the axes are interdependent, does that mean the chart should be drawn at a 45-degree angle?
mediocrity is the key to happiness.
At the height of stress you either only write bare minimum (no creativity) or make it all up (lots and lots of creativity).
Very funny, I can totally relate :)
Ha Ha .. this one is too good .. it does seem a little different but sure is true. Creativity will increase with stress after a certain point. True because, people will find new ways to get over stress and or rather, get the work over and done with. What do you think?
Random thoughts at http://ridethethoughts.blogspot.com
“mediocrity is the key to happiness.”
I think I’ve found my new philosophy in life.
I may be coming in late, but it is clear to us procrastinators that this is exactly accurate–at least for me. We (mostly unconsciously)strategically procrastinate to achieve the deadline-induced surge.
Oh, yeah, and to Rafi and DocDer–depends on your definition (happiness or mediocrity).
To Jamie–sounds too much like actually doing math, don’t forget the premise of this site. :)
Pingback: Fábio Caparica » del.icio.us entre 16.04.2009 e 30.04.2009
Unless otherwise indicated, y is a function of x in these types of graphs. As x changes, y changes in response, with any value of x only having one corresponding y value (though not necessarily vice-versa).
The way I see it, the labels should be switched. Creativity (y) is a function of stress level (x).
Low stress = high creativity
Medium stress = low creativity
High stress = high creativity
Even though the labels are reversed, I still understood it intuitively.
The way it’s labeled now, stress (x) is a function of creativity:
Low creativity = very stressful
Medium creativity = not stressful
High creativity = very stressful
With the current labels, I would draw a graph that indicates an inverse proportion (i.e. the more creative I am, the less stressed out I am).
I prefer the former interpretation. If Jessica is indicating that stress level influences creativity, I am correct.
Keep up the good work, Jessica!
Pingback: Creatividad vs Estrés « Giant Meerkat
I would tend to agree with this.
everyone needs a little pressure but sometimes I think deadlines really put a damper on a project.
Pingback: Deadlines | digipology