About
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.Subscribe
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Categories
- 5×7
- arrogance
- BOOK!
- booze
- brands
- communication
- consumption
- creeps
- crime
- easter bunny
- ego
- ethics
- excuses
- expectations
- experience
- faith
- family
- fashion
- finances
- friends
- gum
- halloween
- hipsters
- inequality
- kids
- language
- love
- men
- moderation
- monsters
- music
- optimism
- orthodontics
- pain
- parties
- patience
- perception
- philosophy
- politics
- pop culture
- queens
- santa
- school
- sickness
- snobs
- snuggling
- sports
- standards
- stress
- success
- technology
- television
- tooth fairy
- travel
- Uncategorized
- value
- virginity
- weight
- women
- work
- xenophobia









Ha ha ha, it took me a second to gather what you meant by “pop-unders.” Brilliant!
I was not aware that netflix awarded prizes, nor that they had anything to do with either the drink or action of pop…. or whac-a-mole.
I don’t get it.
Yeah, this one’s pretty crap alright. Bit of a stretch
i got this one straight away, i think it’s pretty smart.
but maybe it’s me who operates on a lower intellectual level to everyone else?
My only complaint is that whack-a-mole should be an absolute subset of “no prize awarded”
To those who don’t get it:
A “pop-under” is an ad, on your computer, like a pop-up ad except that it opens up _underneath_ your existing browser window. This is a joke about online ads, Netflix being an example of a company that uses plenty of online ads. You’re playing “whac-a-mole” because you have to keep hitting the x’s as the ads appear.
Since I already have Netflix, and a Roku, I find the incessant popunders particularly annoying. They had me at “No late fees.”
As someone who has both won a prize at whack-a-mole and been ripped off by it, I find this hysterically accurate. When I find that Netflix pop-under, it’s as if I can’t “whack” it fast enough.
I didn’t get this because, apparently, my pop-up-blocker works.
Look! It says Whack-a-mole! Let’s go animal rights folks!
Right, so I understand whack-a-mole and no-prize, but what does Netflix have to do with old machines?
Old machines because old computers have more trouble with blocking ads.