The Schrödinger’s cat of infomercial products.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Indexed
{ PUBLISHED WEEKDAY MORNINGS as the COFFEE BREWS }
About this site
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.
- Here's the deal →
Subscribe
RSS:
Blog Archive
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Labels
- 5×7 (17)
- arrogance (18)
- booze (23)
- brands (28)
- communication (59)
- consumption (100)
- creeps (16)
- crime (10)
- easter bunny (3)
- ego (22)
- ethics (63)
- excuses (34)
- expectations (115)
- experience (58)
- faith (29)
- family (47)
- fashion (34)
- finances (103)
- friends (21)
- gum (2)
- halloween (7)
- hipsters (9)
- inequality (40)
- kids (32)
- language (28)
- love (80)
- men (18)
- moderation (13)
- music (4)
- optimism (48)
- orthodontics (4)
- pain (48)
- parties (25)
- patience (17)
- perception (145)
- philosophy (26)
- politics (51)
- pop culture (91)
- queens (1)
- santa (7)
- school (39)
- sickness (38)
- snobs (5)
- snuggling (1)
- sports (5)
- standards (31)
- stress (19)
- success (19)
- technology (25)
- television (24)
- tooth fairy (2)
- travel (22)
- Uncategorized (507)
- value (42)
- virginity (3)
- weight (13)
- women (44)
- work (86)
- xenophobia (2)
January 1st, 2009 at 4:17 pm
There should be a little or maybe a lot more overlapping of the two circles!!
Whoa, I still remember the equation. It saved my ass from failing a physics test. Lol…
Great insight as usual. Cheers!!
January 1st, 2009 at 6:14 pm
Ouch, or, ouch.
January 2nd, 2009 at 12:12 am
I’ll take the ‘not working as advertised’ ripoff.
January 2nd, 2009 at 10:51 am
hilarious. as always.
January 2nd, 2009 at 12:49 pm
You’re a lot smarter than I sometimes give you credit for - whether I always agree with you or not.
(that was not sarcastic)
January 2nd, 2009 at 1:17 pm
Its funny how it works both ways.
January 2nd, 2009 at 2:00 pm
i saw a video on current tv and said to come 2 this website for more…where can i find that video(s)?
January 2nd, 2009 at 2:20 pm
Best. Title. Ever.
And yes, it’s the “take-your-money” kind of rip off. That doesn’t mean it’s also not painful. Just, um (TMI warning), NEVER try to do bikini wax on yourself. Trust me on this one.
January 5th, 2009 at 7:19 am
I think this is officially one of your cleverest strips to date. It took me a while to figure out because I was thinking hair wax as in hair gel, not as in no-hair wax, but the ingenuity still made me smile.
January 9th, 2009 at 10:41 am
Lol! This is everything a strip should be (no pun intended!) - funny, smart and empathetic. Love your blog. Happy new year!