About
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.Subscribe
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Categories
- 5×7
- arrogance
- booze
- brands
- communication
- consumption
- creeps
- crime
- easter bunny
- ego
- ethics
- excuses
- expectations
- experience
- faith
- family
- fashion
- finances
- friends
- gum
- halloween
- hipsters
- inequality
- kids
- language
- love
- men
- moderation
- monsters
- music
- optimism
- orthodontics
- pain
- parties
- patience
- perception
- philosophy
- politics
- pop culture
- queens
- santa
- school
- sickness
- snobs
- snuggling
- sports
- standards
- stress
- success
- technology
- television
- tooth fairy
- travel
- Uncategorized
- value
- virginity
- weight
- women
- work
- xenophobia








EXACTLY! When I was a student I think I was at the far left of this… now I’m in the middle, trying to get to the right. *sigh* enough break time, back to work…
Heh… reminds me of Office Space: “Well, you don’t need a million dollars to do nothing, man. Take a look at my cousin: he’s broke, don’t do shit. “
Hehehe…
when i grow up, i wanna be on the right side of this diagram…
@ JA: great quote! =)
Great representation! I wonder… if the y-axis was labeled “hard work” or “effort” would it yield an inverse curve to the one given?
CJ Guest, considering how many rich people are born into money without having to work that much at all, and how many people work hard only to end up broke, I think that one might need a little more work…
The backward bending labor supply curve!
Yey for microeconomics.
I disagree. (Someone is wrong on the Internet!)
* If you are very broke, you have a lot of free time.
* If you have only a little money, you have to work like a camel.
* If you have some more money, you can afford a little free time.
* If you have a lot of money, you’re working a high-responsability job and work like a camel.
* If you are very rich, you don’t have to work at all.
So your curve is missing a central hump; it should look more like a W.
so bloody true.. .i just changed my fb status before jumping here.. lmao..
I think it’s interesting that the lowest point is where the cause and effect relationship are reversed…
The less time you use freely (not working) the more money you have, until you hit a tipping point of being able to afford some free time.
Very succinctly captured. (Though, that’s the point of a diagram)
Great points Jaime and Anon.
Pingback: Jessica Hagy… right on the money « Tangents and Digressions
How true!
True to a point. The money axis could say “perception of wealth”. ….. But then it wouldn’t be as funny.
It would still depend on how you are going to use the time. For some people, free time still is making them money.
Wow – somebody has never been broke as shit working two jobs to support a family. The comments above asking for a W are along the right track, but the real answer is: hard work and effort have some relation to money and free time, but not one as direct as we like to tell ourselves.
At the very least, I guess the graph is notable in that it’s gotten everybody talking about things! Kind of like Duchamp’s “Fountain” ;)
Ah, yes. Would someone please buy our house in the midwest so we can afford to keep our apartment in NJ, where we moved for my husband’s job? *sigh*
it is accurately what I need
Pingback: Laen Aggregated » Google Shared Items - 12/29/2008
Pingback: Wayne Boardman at wboardman.com » Blog Archive » This about sums it up
Pingback: What are you doing today? « Breaking into the Kitchen
graph cannot reverse at tiping point.
it needs to be flat at bottom.
we stretch a lot-probably many years in that condiction- good earning with no free time
Pingback: My Blog » Blog Archive » This about sums it up