He gets it from his dad.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
This entry was posted in perception, pop culture. Bookmark the permalink.

29 Responses to He gets it from his dad.

  1. Ed says:

    Ok.. sorry, maybe i’m dense… wasn’t chucky pretty evil?, and why isn’t Rosemary in a longer parent teacher conference, who is Damien and is Foster referring to a foster child. Usually i get these, but maybe i’m just a bit obtuse today.

  2. lk says:

    a quick google of “damien evil child” reveals he’s the main character in the movie “the omen.”

    see…not hard.

  3. (x, why?) says:

    Just a little confusing because Damien is the child, but Rosemary is not. And I know Chucky had a bride, but I don’t know about a child.

    On the other hand, I just had Parent-Teacher conferences a week ago and . . . .

  4. Babs says:

    Rosemary = mother of Satan’s spawn (“Rosemary’s Baby”)
    Damien = The son of the devil (“The Omen”)
    Chucky = Evil, possessed doll (“Child’s Play” Series)
    Foster = Elijah Wood? (“The Good Son??”)

    I’m not sure how to follow this one either.

  5. Yeah, sorry. Even understanding most of the references (still not sure about Foster), I can’t figure out how to read the graph.

  6. Cory says:

    Perhaps not a movie character, but the more generic ‘foster child’?

  7. Ditocoaf says:

    Hmm… or maybe they’re not meant to be references at all (except damien), and instead is a commentary on how sweet-looking little girls are more likely to get away with being nasty?

  8. Ditocoaf says:

    (I say this only because Rosemary is a girls’ name. They’re all just names, you see.)

  9. Romy says:

    Perhaps Chucky from the Rugrats?

  10. mike says:

    I think it’s just different name’s tendacies to sound “evil” or “innocent”.

  11. craig says:

    maybe chucky is referring to the kid who owned the doll. the adults all thought he was crazy for saying his doll killed people, but he wasn’t evil.

  12. Marcus says:

    where’s the young dick cheney on this?

  13. Sketchy says:

    Or the young george bush?

  14. Adrienne says:

    Chucky was bad…the kid wasn’t. But the kid got blamed for what Chucky did.

    Still don’t get Foster and Rosemary.

  15. richard says:

    Foster of Foster’s Home for Imaginary Friends?

  16. Alex says:

    It could also be Chucky from Rugrats.

  17. Tom says:

    Chucky makes sense in terms of the evilness of the child being low, but the P-T conference being long, because the doll was evil, not the child, so there was a lot of esplainin’ (oops, wrong genre) to do.

  18. Rosemary says:

    Rosemary’s baby’s name was Adrian. Apples, oranges?

  19. nothanks says:

    Chucky is Chucky from the series with John Ritter, Problem Child, not the doll.

  20. Lili says:

    I love this, and i am being a stickler, but you’ve got your dependent and independent axes mixed up. The length of the conference relies on the evilness, not the other way around.

  21. Jessica says:

    Wow, ya’ll are dense. It very obviously says “Evilness of CHILD”. (Emphasis mine.) Rosemary was a character in Rosemary’s baby. Her child was VERY evil, but a baby, so no conference. Damien from The Omen was an extremely evil child and of school age, hence his position. Chucky is a doll from the movie Childs Play, but the child HIMSELF was not evil, and was ‘misunderstood’. So he gets low evil, long conference. Foster is referring to just that, a foster child.

  22. Dana says:

    The reason some foster children have that status is because they are getting it from their dad…

  23. Pingback: Parents have stopped reading books to their children | Family Sense

  24. Jemaleddin says:

    @Dana: Ooooh – crass.

    But no, this really doesn’t hang together well. They can’t all be home runs.

  25. Panchi says:

    Jessica is right. @Dana – the foster child doesn’t “get it from his dad” – he doesn’t have a dad or mom around, so no parent-teacher conference.

  26. *sigh* says:

    You guys think way too much into it.

  27. I’m not even kidding you: There was a woman in my La Leche League group who named one of her boys Damien and one of them Cain.

  28. Jake says:

    Did she ride a broom?

  29. Keith Brings says:

    Meh, I read it as this,

    The lengthyness of the conference had to do with blaming the parents for the nastyness of their child, partially do to their choice of name which reflects their parenting skill.

    So a parent who names there kid after the most evil damien from the omen gets a good lengthy what were you thinking lecture. While a parent with a perfectly innocent kid named chucky after chucky gets another decently long lecture.

    Meanwhile even though rosemary is evil incarnate, the parents were nice enough.

    . . . Ofcourse, I suppose those are all common names anyway. Sniff.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>