About
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.Subscribe
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.
So things with just horns and claws, horns and venom, or venom and claws are still a threat?
Your comment just ruined it to me.
Thanks, it’s delicious up here!
* well armored giant brains
you know, with pointy sticks and whatnot
If p then q does not mean not p then not q. It does mean the not q then not p. Therefore it says nothing about beasts with only two or fewer attributes, to include ones with none of the above (e.g other people with trimmed nails). Giant brains may or may not be able to defeat them. You can say that if giant brains can’t beat an organism that it does not have venom, horns and claws. I also don’t know of an animal that has all three, so the diagram may not say much.
…they are also defeated by giant corn dogs.
The idea the Man is at the top of the food chain is merely a hopeful assumption.
constantly refuted, much to God’s chagrin.
… and one giant circle around them all, labeled ‘eaten by brainless, hornless, clawless, venomless one-celled organisms’.
And opposable thumbs, don’t forget opposable thumbs. You don’t want to know what chimpanzees are capable of doing with that grabbing ability of theirs.