About
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.Subscribe
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Categories
- 5×7
- arrogance
- BOOK!
- booze
- brands
- communication
- consumption
- creeps
- crime
- easter bunny
- ego
- ethics
- excuses
- expectations
- experience
- faith
- family
- fashion
- finances
- friends
- gum
- halloween
- hipsters
- inequality
- kids
- language
- love
- men
- moderation
- monsters
- music
- optimism
- orthodontics
- pain
- parties
- patience
- perception
- philosophy
- politics
- pop culture
- queens
- santa
- school
- sickness
- snobs
- snuggling
- sports
- standards
- stress
- success
- technology
- television
- tooth fairy
- travel
- Uncategorized
- value
- virginity
- weight
- women
- work
- xenophobia









Yes, its true that some of the cheaper restaurants serve children, though in their defense, properly prepared, they can be quite tasty.
Couldn’t kids be kept in school 24/7 until about age 21? Call it the 24/7/21 program. I think it would make shopping a lot more peaceful, as well as dining. Write your congressman.
Well hot diggity damn why didn’t I think of that.. no wait… yellow!
You cruel, insensate, cold-blooded fiend! How could you suggest such heartless treatment of poor, innocent teachers!
I suppose you are right, Fireflight. Hadn’t really thought that one through… but don’t those people *like* kids? Maybe a little hazard pay would help. I’m flex.
I like those restaurants where you can pick your own small child in the tank.
“Bring me the brown one, he amuses me!”
– Richard Jeni
that’s it i’m opening a restaurant to buck the trend – filet mignon happy meals and lobster tail fingers
As a parent of a small child, I must say I’m delighted at this correlation.
They use a cookbook!
[Obscure Damon Knight reference.]
As long as you stop short of the obscure Wayne Knight references.
Nah, the dilophosaurus got him, so why bother.
You could also switch the axes, suggesting that this is a “chicken or the egg” problem.
Do families with small children flock to cheap restaurants because of the low prices -or- are restaurants forced to lower their prices in order to combat the negative impact that having small children around has on a restaurant’s desirability?
Yes.