About
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.Subscribe
Architecture, romance, careers, whatnot.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
So true…
Fire up the RV, hon. We need some mobility.
Needs an outlier dot upper right: Bicycles.
Ah yes. Life is a slide down the razor blade between freedom and bondage.
It’s times like these where you have to throw the parachute out the door and say “fuck it!”
The mobile line would be have more mobility if that string wasn’t attached to that stable line.
@HowardBollixter: I think not. Bicycles would fit at the middle, at best, with tricycles well farther right. That would leave the outlier upper right to trimarans.
Actually it is all in your mind…stability is not a function of others or circumstances…it is simply how one chooses to react to such.
To be at ease with your environment, is to be truly free. Live in the present and choose to be happy. Idealistic? Not really…entirely achievable? With practice, definitely!
Besides, I love walking…and do so every day…my mobility contributes to my stability, and my health.
Be well all…
@henrykwdk: Er, that would be why we see so many tricycles with kickstands? :) The stability of trimarans and tricycles is completely independent of their mobility, and the utter opposite of bicycle physics.
(Apologies to Jessica for taking this idea a bit off-piste.)
@HowardBollixter: Right. Support wheels might work even better: when I once owned a tricycle, I managed one day, much to my surprise, to almost topple it. The 2-wheels-in-the-front version is rather more stable when turning (might still need kickstands when parked, though :-) ).
You are completely right about n-cycle & x-maran physics. I was just thinking about mobility in terms of range rather than speed.
Pingback: Bloglines RIP « Unkategorized