Resources were not allocated efficiently.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
This entry was posted in expectations, finances. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Resources were not allocated efficiently.

  1. Strayhiker says:

    Or….tastes like chicken!

  2. Fuiru says:

    Heh, I just started an Economics course, so I get the reference. I wouldn’t have done two weeks ago, mind.

  3. Erm says:

    I’ve got a friend who likes to talk about gunbutter. And he’s not talking about military/luxury economic balance…

  4. NSK says:

    Am I being too naive in thinking that she wants to say that handling guns with buttery (or oily) fingers results in accidental shootings?

    I would think that if there were no guns, there would be no accidental shootings.

  5. tudza says:

    And if there were no butter we would be butter-less.

    That’s the way I read this, but of course guns and butter is an economics way of saying “Do you want good defense or good times?”, which makes this amusing.

  6. Chaz says:

    “Butterfingers”.

    That is all.

  7. bryce says:

    i appreciate the economics reference. good old opportunity costs and the production possibility frontier. haha.

    i very much appreciate =)

  8. Robert K says:

    ‘Had to look up the economics reference. Cute. :-)

    Find myself wondering what the circles for “YouTube” and “Alcohol” would look like on this one.

  9. Ankher says:

    I also just started an economics course. Impeccable timing?

  10. pullingsocks says:

    Impeccable timing? At the beginning of the school year? Nahhh…

  11. m says:

    “I would think that if there were no guns, there would be no accidental shootings.”

    If there was no butter, there would be no need for guns.