About
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.Subscribe
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Categories
- 5×7
- arrogance
- booze
- brands
- communication
- consumption
- creeps
- crime
- easter bunny
- ego
- ethics
- excuses
- expectations
- experience
- faith
- family
- fashion
- finances
- friends
- gum
- halloween
- hipsters
- inequality
- kids
- language
- love
- men
- moderation
- monsters
- music
- optimism
- orthodontics
- pain
- parties
- patience
- perception
- philosophy
- politics
- pop culture
- queens
- santa
- school
- sickness
- snobs
- snuggling
- sports
- standards
- stress
- success
- technology
- television
- tooth fairy
- travel
- Uncategorized
- value
- virginity
- weight
- women
- work
- xenophobia








Pingback: Is today black Monday? - Page 48 - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
can someone help me understand black monday’s response to todays indexed??
Maybe, but not me. I see things like that all the time. I assume that they aren’t humans, but little programs that make posts and try to lure you to their home sites. It’s kind of cute, in a ‘they-try-really-hard-and-get-nowhere’ kind of way.
@yefet
That’s exactly what I was going to ask.
@yefet = follow the linky. A self-reference to a forum post.
Too bad the boobs in the top two circles gather more attention and a bigger share of the bailout (whether from the goverment or sugar daddies) than the ones in National Geographic.
The odd-looking comments are pingbacks or trackbacks, automatic posts made by the blogging software (or what have you) on another site when a poster there links to something here. It’s useful for exposing where other people are talking about the same thing being discussed here. They (the person linking to here) may also be hoping to generate some traffic to their site.
Pingback: How did those boobs get like that?: BRAD NEESE AT LARGE
Pingback: Gary Said...
The WSJ boobs should be on the bottom. On second though they don’t even deserve a circle.
Oh, that one is perfect.
I think a lot of you are confusing “Wall Street Journal” with “Wall Street employee.”
The former is quite economically reliable. The latter is diametrically opposed.
Pingback: Beautiful Futility » Absolute Genius
(Just saw Jared’s post but I had already written the following so posting it anyway :)
@yefet and @bri:
What Black Monday posted wasn’t a comment. In fact, Black Monday didn’t post a comment at all. What you see is what is called a trackback. It’s a way to display what websites have linked to this particular blog posts. Many blogs display comments and trackbacks separately, while others, like Indexed, display them in the same place. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trackback for more info.
@ISammael: Indexed is not referring to the WSJ as the “boob,” it’s referring to what’s found inside the WSJ, in the same way it’s referring to what’s found inside Playboy and National Georgraphic, which of course in themselves, are most definitely not boobs.
todays is perfection!
Mike said:
“The WSJ boobs should be on the bottom. On second though they don’t even deserve a circle.”
Sure they deserve a circle…of Hell. Eighth one.
Pingback: daily digest for 2009-01-06 - midnightsolitude
WSJ should be replaced with NYT.
Perfect! made me laugh out loud!