About
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.Subscribe
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Categories
- 5×7
- arrogance
- booze
- brands
- communication
- consumption
- creeps
- crime
- easter bunny
- ego
- ethics
- excuses
- expectations
- experience
- faith
- family
- fashion
- finances
- friends
- gum
- halloween
- hipsters
- inequality
- kids
- language
- love
- men
- moderation
- monsters
- music
- optimism
- orthodontics
- pain
- parties
- patience
- perception
- philosophy
- politics
- pop culture
- queens
- santa
- school
- sickness
- snobs
- snuggling
- sports
- standards
- stress
- success
- technology
- television
- tooth fairy
- travel
- Uncategorized
- value
- virginity
- weight
- women
- work
- xenophobia
Opa, nein!
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.








don’t get it…
I would have gone with “people wearing socks and sandels”
A perpendicular trace would represent white legs in bad shorts…
Is that a pound? £
No, that’s a Euro.
I think this means: the stronger the Euro, the more European tourists.
and tourists are usually old people.
and old people have no shame.
(translation of title: GRANDPA, NO!)
No, i think it means the more men on the beach in speedos, the stronger the incentives for foreign man-thong-loving investors to pour cash into the European markets as an excuse to come to Europe in person to watch their assets grow. in size. penis.
but speedos are the dependent variable! (i bet that’s the first time that phrase has been typed, ever)
I blame the damn republicans!
maybe speedos on American beaches would help clarify but nonetheless like all on indexed, hilarious and intelligent
America needs more nude beaches.
My eyes! My eyes are bleeding!!
america does need more nude beaches. im plannign on going to one in NJ soon tho
Is that relative to the US dollar? If so, yes, blame republicans.
I’ve been reading you for a long time. This is genius.
Come on guys, a little bit more tolerance. Just because your buck isn’t worth anything anymore and just because America is prude (and considers speedo wearers as gays), it doesn’t mean that Europeans aren’t allowed to wear speedos :P
Personally, I don’t like wearing them, but I am bothered by the American prudeness that is taking overhand lately. Sorry.
PH
haha i like your title for it.
@ Philipp,
Pretty sure Americans don’t consider speedos to be gay. They’re just terribly unflattering on most people that wear them.
Phillip…it has nothing to do with being gay…no one in the US likes seing “junk” on display. You should realize that this is especially unflattering after going in water for any period of time. However, we do think putting your “junk in a box” is hysterical.
learning the titles translation made it even more hilarious xD
I would like to apologise for the speedo’s and state it is something I don’t endorse at all.
(Didn’t know there was such a big problem anyway)
BTW, it’s not the € that’s strong, it a weak $