About
This site is a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.Subscribe
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Categories
- 5×7
- arrogance
- BOOK!
- booze
- brands
- communication
- consumption
- creeps
- crime
- easter bunny
- ego
- ethics
- excuses
- expectations
- experience
- faith
- family
- fashion
- finances
- friends
- gum
- halloween
- hipsters
- inequality
- kids
- language
- love
- men
- moderation
- monsters
- music
- optimism
- orthodontics
- pain
- parties
- patience
- perception
- philosophy
- politics
- pop culture
- queens
- santa
- school
- sickness
- snobs
- snuggling
- sports
- standards
- stress
- success
- technology
- television
- tooth fairy
- travel
- Uncategorized
- value
- virginity
- weight
- women
- work
- xenophobia









This is a great one. Tragically true.
It hits zero long before 40. :-)
A good one, I would agree wholeheartedly, but does it work for both sexes and all genders…? just wonderings…
Now, now….
It seems to me that the baggage at 25 years old is generated by someone else – mothers in particular. (Have you talked to a 25 years old recently??) Over 40 it’s all self generated baggage.
You get baggage either way. Welcome to human life.
That’s depressing…
I’d say it’s also very much a geographical factor!
Funny nonetheless…
;)
P
Love it! Where does Ben put himself on the line?
It shows I don’t have any baggages. Yay!
yeah dublin! coffman ftw
AWESOME!
This all started from a conversation I had with a friend of mine who recently became engaged:
Dude, you’re lucky
Start thinking about the math
Assume you have all women: 1.00
Lets say, at this age, slightly more than are attractive and worth going for. .6
Lets say that each year, 20% of those (conservatively) get married off
Age 22: 0.6
Age 23: 0.48
Age 24: 0.384
Age 25: 0.3072
Age 26: 0.24576
Age 27: 0.196608
You have 2 real shots at this.
1. Do what you did. Pick ‘em young, while they are still available.
2. Become more attractive ($$$) so that, even though there are fewer, you are more capable of winning them than the other schmucks left on the market
That 20% annual attrition rate doesn’t take into account those coming back on the market. ; )
Need to remap it (probably a bell curve) as “without baggage, but mature”.
Wolfger has a good point. But to remain consistent, “mature” should be rephrased to “close to the light” or “ready to knock off”. :D
I think baggage is half the fun of a relationship. It’s what makes chemistry real. If you look for someone without any, all you’ll find is someone that’ll latch onto yours.
I think it’s a line from “Rent”
“I’m looking for baggage to go with mine.”
This inspired my own version of a Hagy Index (is there a name for these?).
http://holdthemilk.blogspot.com/2007/04/this-is-not-actually-post.htm
should probably be exponential decay…